Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement: A
Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering and Scientific Journal (AEEESJ)
Advanced Electrical and Electronics Engineering and Scientific Journal(AEEESJ) is a quarterly international journal aims to publish scientific articles in an electronic form. AEEESJ is a peer-reviewed Engineering and Scientific journal. All manuscripts undergo a rigorous review process. AEEESJ employs a paperless, electronic review process to enable a fast and speedy turnaround in the review process.
ISSN: 2520-7539 (Online)
We welcome experts and professionals to join our Editorial Board. If you are interested in becoming an Editor, please complete the Application Form. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, please complete the Application Form.
PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
AEEESJ is an electronic peer-reviewed international journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. To provide our readers with a journal of the highest quality, we state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement. All articles not by these standards will be removed from the publication if malpractice is discovered at any time even after the publication. AEEESJ is checking all papers in a double-blind peer-review process. We also check for plagiarism and research fabrication (making up research data); falsification (manipulation of existing research data, tables, or images) and improper use of humans or animals in research. Following the code of conduct, we will report any cases of suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing.
Journal AEEESJ reserves the right to use plagiarism detecting software (SafeAssign by Blackboard) to screen submitted papers at all times.
Safe Assign is based on a unique text matching algorithm capable of detecting exact and inexact matching between a paper and source material. Submissions are compared against several databases:
Internet: Comprehensive index of documents available for public access on the internet.
Institutional document archives: Contains all papers submitted to SafeAssign by users in their respective institutions.
Authors must ensure that they have written original works. Also, they must make sure that the manuscript has not been issued elsewhere. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources should be appropriately credited and referenced. The authors are also responsible for language editing before submitting the article.
Authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles confirm that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works without clearly citing. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources (including online sites) should be appropriately credited and referenced. All authors should disclose the financial or another conflict of interest that might influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript (financial support for the project should be disclosed). When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. An author agrees to the license agreement before submitting the article. All articles must be submitted using the online submission procedure. Submitting a paper simultaneously to more than one publication at a time is a breach of publication ethics.
Editors must ensure a fair double-blind peer-review of the submitted articles for publication. They will strive to prevent any potential conflict of interests between the author and editorial and review personnel. Editors will also ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential before publishing. Editor-in-Chief will coordinate the work of the editors.
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors. They must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept as confidential and must report to the Editor-in-Chief if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side. They must evaluate the submitted works objectively as well as present clearly their opinions on the works in a clear way in the review form. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor-in-Chief and excuse himself from the review process.